The Good And Worst of Company of Heroes 3
From its highly-regarded predecessors to its much-anticipated sequel, Company of Heroes 3 has had a troubled launch. Are you wondering if it’s fixable?
Despite its flaws, the game still offers many exciting features and unique strategies. In this blog, we’ll explore the good and bad of Company of Heroes 3 and whether it can be salvaged.
Is Company of Heroes 3 Fixable
The strategy game Company of Heroes 3 has experienced a rocky launch, receiving criticism for its simplified design, uninspired aesthetic, and lack of content overall. It is released to a gaming audience who is already addicted to its cinematic predecessors—a daunting challenge for any game company. Yet, despite the daunting odds that are presented by the record-breaking popularity of its predecessors, CoH3 still has some redeeming features worth revisiting. In this article we will take a look at both the good and bad sides of CoH3 in an effort to determine if it is salvageable or not. First and foremost, before discussing any aspects of the game itself, it’s important to remember that while CoH3 was released without much fanfare in comparison to its spiritual predecessor—Company of Heroes 1 & 2—the title has enjoyed some success among new generations of gamers due to its unique blend of strategy and action-RPG mechanics as well as its groundbreaking visual presentation. The contrast between realistic combat forces and exceptionally detailed characters creates a compelling atmosphere that entices both new and experienced gamers alike. Furthermore, the narrative approach implemented by CoH3 contains welcome portions designed specifically for fan favorite factions from the previous titles such as Oberkommando West and British Commandos which all adds up a sense wistfulness at times – no mean feat given the fact that these predecessors almost feel like distant memories.
In terms of potential salvaging points from both Reddit users forums (CoHHive) as well as extensive reviews on Metacritic however it seems like there’s more than a few things which would need looking into in order for any meaningful improvement on the state matters with respect to this particular title; most notably contents scale back across PvE & PvP modes along with lack content variety in general based outside multiplayer affairs seem like they severely hinder player experience through certain points; what’s more even map selection too leaves something to be desired as it seems some maps are strictly better than others ranking wise leading players toward certain choice automatically when playing alone – an oft lamented design choice devoid on freedom or agency which isn’t exactly commended either in forums or especially during stream / viewer feedback one might see during match type replays or commentaries from dedicated Youtubers out there who follow this particular section quite closely already. All things considered Company Of Heroes 3 presents itself quite a challenging prospect in order for To be ‘salvageable’ yet perhaps the full picture needs reviewing before a definitive answer can be provided either way but hopefully one day such debate will become moot point altogether….
Overview of Company of Heroes 3
Company of Heroes 3 is a real-time strategy game developed by Relic Entertainment and published by Sega. It is the third installment in the Company of Heroes series and was released for Windows in June 2020. In the game, you control multiple squads of soldiers on either the Allied or Axis sides and attempt to capture objectives from your opponent. The gameplay largely revolves around combat, with both sides using cover, terrain, and orders against each other as they battle for control. The game has been highly praised for its innovative approach to real-time strategy and intense battles. However, Company of Heroes 3 has suffered from several major issues since launch. These include technical difficulties such as drops in frame rate and long loading times as well as balance issues between different units and factions. Despite these issues, many fans have remained dedicated to the game, hoping that future updates address some of these problems. As a result, it can be difficult to determine whether Company of Heroes 3 is truly fixable or if it’s destined to remain an unpolished gem.
Pros of Company of Heroes 3
Company of Heroes 3 is an incredible sequel to the beloved Company of Heroes series. Unfortunately, the game has faced some technical difficulties that have caused many players to be less than thrilled with the iteration. Despite these issues, there are still some great aspects of Company of Heroes 3 that make it worth checking out:
• Graphics: Company of Heroes 3 features great visuals and realistic animations which makes for a truly immersive experience.
• Gameplay: The latest title offers more strategic gaming options and balancing changes which enhances the intensity of each battle.
• Customization: Players can create their own maps and soldiers to customize their experience in-game.
• Maps and Modes: CoH3 includes plenty of new maps and modes such as Assault mode or Atlas Mode to keep your battles fresh and exciting over time.
• Mod Support: Even though it took a while, mod support is now in place which allows players to customize their experience even further with mods made by other gamers.
• AI Enhanced Combat: Advanced AI provides challenging opponents in conflicts, making it easier for people who play online with others or solo without feeling like they’re at an extreme disadvantage against computer-controlled enemies.
Cons of Company of Heroes 3
Despite the potential for a great game, Company of Heroes 3 has serious drawbacks that are difficult to ignore. One of the main cons is the lack of mod support. Modding has been a major feature in almost all previous titles and it has been confirmed that there won’t be mod support for Company of Heroes 3. This means that players will not be able to create customized maps and unit types, which could potentially limit replayability and reduce the longevity of the game.
Additionally, some players have expressed dissatisfaction with the game’s pricing model as it is reported to be very expensive and pay-to-win oriented. This could lead to a high barrier to entry, especially for more casual players who may not want to commit as much money or time into the game. Furthermore, some gamers report instability issues such as slowdowns, glitches and crashes. Addressing these performance issues should be one of the main objectives for Relic Entertainment if they wish to make Company Of Heroes 3 an enjoyable experience for everyone.
Potential Fixes For Company of Heroes 3
Company of Heroes 3 players have identified several potential fixes for the game’s issues. While some of these may be able to be easily implemented, others may require more attention or modifications from Relic Entertainment. One potential fix involves altering the game’s economy, as some players believe it’s too slow which leads to slower games and less possibilities for or strategic planning. Changing the in-game resource rates, or even adding an additional resource type, could potentially provide a better overall balance. Additionally, adjusting the unit versatility could help make sure none of the existing units become obsolete when new items are released or new strategies come into existence.
Another potential way to fix Company of Heroes 3 is to reduce microtransactions or at least make them more reasonable and attainable by players who do not have access to large amounts of funds. Additionally, making cosmetics purchasable with in-game currency rather than real money would also provide more access for users who play for free. Finally, introducing rewards like unlocking skins with achievements would add more content that does not rely on buying microtransactions for obtaining them. Some more extreme measures could help with resolving issues with Company of Heroes 3 as well: Introducing regular patch notes that outline exactly what changes were made before they go live is one way to ensure players receive communication from developers about their changes and updates made to the game. Additionally, increasing transparency between developers and gamers would also ensure that player voices are heard while still giving freedom of development without too much intervention from other individuals and groups not related directly to development itself. Lastly, opening up map testing opportunities on both existing maps as well as beta versions prior to release may allow changes and editing prior to implementation so that every detail has been accounted for before coming into play for all users’ enjoyment.
Pros And Cons of Potential Fixes
As Company of Heroes 3 is currently under development, fixing the existing game can involve a balance of potential pros and cons. In order to improve on the current game, certain changes may need to be made, which could lead to improvements or detriment in certain areas. However, when weighed against the overall end result these changes could improve the game overall. Below are some potential pros and cons of potential fixes.
Pros: -Graphics update: Improved graphics could give players an updated view of the battlefield that adds realism and enhances immersion. -Gameplay updates: Better gameplay mechanics could provide more interesting combat situations and make battles feel more strategic/challenging. -Balancing updates: Adjustments to unit stats or abilities may allow for more balanced matchups between different factions or even within a single faction’s army.
Cons: -Interface update: A new user interface could require players to re-learn how to play the game, taking time away from gaming and requiring additional effort from longterm players who are accustomed to using a specific layout. -Change in pacing/style: Updates that change how units move or interact with one another can drastically alter tactical styles necessitating new strategies outside of what existing players may have grown used to utilizing. -Reworked maps/units : Altering map layouts as well as replacing certain units with new ones could reduce popularity for specific maps as well as create unfamiliarity for veteran players.
In conclusion, Company of Heroes 3 has both its strengths and weaknesses. Gameplay appears mostly solid, though the scarcity of maps and the UI leave a bit to be desired. Campaigns lack direction and cohesion and need improvement. The meta layer looks interesting, but poorly balanced factions make it difficult to enjoy. Additionally, many players have voiced their disappointment with the game’s sheer amount of microtransactions. Given these findings, it seems apparent that Company of Heroes 3 is indeed fixable. SEGA should continue balancing existing factions along with providing meaningful campaigns with engaging missions and unique objectives in order to restore faith in the franchise’s fan base. By doing so they can ensure a successful transition into the next installment of their beloved series.